Andrew Bergman, We're in the Money: Depression America and its Films, Harper and Row, New York, 1971.
'Sixty Million persons did not escape into a void each week: escapism is hardly a useful concept. People do not escape into something they cannot relate to. The movies were meaningful because they depcited things lost or things desired.' (p.xii)
'what happens in depression movies is that traditional beliefs in the possibilitites of individual success are kept alive in the early thirties under various guises, that scapegoats for social dislocation are found are found and that federal benevolence becomes an implicit and ultimately dead-ended premise by the end of the decade. Hollywood would help the nation's fundamental institutions escape unscathed by attempting to keep alive the myth and wonderful fantasy of a mobile and classless society, by focusing on the endless possibilites for individual success, by turning social evil into persoanl evil and making the New Deal into a vertiable leading man.(p.xvi)
Brian Neve, Film and Politics in America: A Social Tradition, Routledge, London, 1992.
'It is generally suggested that in the
second half of the thirties few important films had much social or political
relevance.' (p.2)
'By the mid-thirties Warners had established
itself as the Hollywood studio most interested in contemporary social and
political events, and in the lives and problems of working people.' (p.15)
David Parkinson, History of Film, Thames and Hudson, 1995.
Parkinson argues that all of the studios featured the following common stylistic traits: 'sets were invariably lit for scene, stars and atmosphere in that order. Editing was largely functional and limited to transitions, 'shot-reverse-shot' and rapid-time passages, achieved by a combination of cuts and superimpositions known as 'Hollywood montage' (p.97)
He also holds that there were differences between them as well: 'MGM proclaimed the virtues of American life, Paramount... alluded to the supposed decadence of Europe' (p.100); 'Warners possessed the tough realistic style that was perfectly suited to gangster, prison and social problem pictures.' (p.101)
LINKS
|
1920's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1960's |
|
|
|
|